So, just about our first month with scalix in our organization. We started with 11.0.1 and a week later we upgraded to 11.0.2 server/OL_connector. Nobody has SmartCache ON anymore.
Below is a list of *EXTREME ANNOYANCES OR BUGS*. I say extreme because in practice they affect primarily the "C's" in the company, by that I mean the *Senior Management* group: CEO, CFO, COO, CTO, and all mid-management personnel and they all use Outlook 2003. It has been very difficult for me to take the beating on behalf of scalix, in particular because I made the recommendation. That means, if I don't have a solution very soon, possibly for the very next maintenance release next week (11.0.3), I may be forced to reconsider the whole scalix exercise.
Here it goes (as I said, in order of priority):
1) BLACKBERRY:
Very often entries on Calendar/Contacts appear to be fine from OL or SWA, but when it's time to sync with the BB they choke at some point. The workaround has been to either delete the entry of "save" it again. When the choking happens at 22/25 entries it's not a big deal, since we can quickly find the problem entry by trial/error, but when we has 729/750 or 1122/1200 entries the situation is much different, because it makes the BB sync process impractical and the BB calendar useless. All senior staff has a Blackberry. I blame this squarely on the connector, since we *never* had this problem before synchronizing BB with Outlook and local pst files.
2) OUTLOOK CRASHES ON QUIT:
although much less than in 11.0.1, we still have a lot of crashes in 11.0.2. It appears to be a difference between quitting OL the "nice and clean" way, by File->Exit menu, and the many other ways people do in practice, ie, by clicking on the red X at the top right corner of the windows, by Alt-F4 or close when the windows is minimized on the taskbar, or just logging out or shutting down the computer. I'm not sure if this issue related to the previous one somehow, but the fact is that we are seeing the post exit message to "send a report to MS" very often, and the start OL in safe move right after. But why? I'm asking everybody to use the *clean way* to exit, but the unexplained crashes continue to happen. I blame this squarely on the connector, since we *never* had this problem before with Outllook 2003.
3) LOSS OF THE "TO:" field auto-completion history:
For a number of reasons I've been forced to re-create the scalix profile so often, in an attempt to fix problems that I can not identify the cause, trying smartcache ON/OFF, etc. Each time this is done OL forgets how to auto-complete the address of the recipients. I still don't know how to at least preserve that history/cache from before. Users have the expectation that this is a very simple problem not to have a solution, and blame the extra work on scalix.
4) WINMAIL.DAT masking attachments or inline email threads:
Several posts on this subject and no solution yet. In fact not even a good description of how things get to this point. I have a very simple way to present this issue. I can access the same scalix server in 3 ways:
a) using the connector
b) using IMAP
c) using SWA
*Only* a) shows the attachments as a winmail.dat file. So I blame this squarely on the connector. You have no idea how upsetting this issue has been for the partners. The only reason it's not on top of the list is because they can always ask their secretaries to send a copy of the attachments again, or they access the email via SWA. The majority of users are not *Premium*, so there is no need for the connector/MAPI features, so I can get away with IMAP, but *ALL* senior staff require MAPI, they are the most exposed users to these deficiencies, and they have the power of decision making, and can pretty much tell me to pull the plug on Scalix.
For me all the above are serious issues. None of them are requests for new features. I just want the *existing features* to work properly, so that we have an improved stability of the system. There are still a few days left before the next maintenance release. I request and hope that the Scalix developers give the much needed priority I believe these issues deserve.
Thanks
Jaime
PS: on a personal note, this whole thing is making me look very bad.
In the old days there was a saying: "nobody gets fired for buying IBM, doesn't matter how expensive they are".
Later on when IBM got in the business of personal computers, and started to use Windows instead of OS/2 the saying became: "nobody gets fired for buying Microsoft, doesn't matter how buggy and insecure"