florian wrote:As I have said numerous times, I don't have association with the management of Scalix or Xandros at this point
This has been known to me for quite some time, and my comments were not directed at you in any way, but at the company behind Scalix.
The only criticism against you in my post would be that you hold Kevin by ethical standards that "even" Scalix doesn't meet

florian wrote:Talking about "death" here is inappropriate, IMHO, and even if I am not satisfied with the lack of progress for the Scalix product in many ways,
We're approaching 2 years without a release now, we still have no ActiveSync thats working well enough to actually use it without constantly encountering problems and 1 1/2 years after Outlook 2010 RTM there isn't even a hint on when it will be supported.
Everyone has to decide for him/herself whether something like that calls for "not satisfying" or "dead project" as an accurate description. This is certainly a point open to debate.
florian wrote:the fact alone that this forum still exists is, to some extent, positive proof that your statement is factually incorrect.
This however, is not a point open to debate. Because every other dead Xandros project also has working Forums (Xandros Linux: http://forums.xandros.com/, Xandros Presto: http://www.prestomypc.com/forums/).
Surely suggesting that
those projects might receive any updated just because the forum is still up would be absolutely ridiculous.
And regarding to our new Sebring overlords: Considering that they've not managed to update the Scalix Website with a news bulletin that they've acquired the company almost three months after the aquisition... IMHO that means they either can't change anything including the forums (still searching for login/pass after 3 months?) or don't care (wonder what they paid the money for then) or aren't allowed to (maybe something went wrong buying Scalix and they're trying to back off).
Either of those options warrants calling the project "dead" in my opinion. Sebring had the option to restore confidence in the community after buying Scalix and deliberately chose not to do so. That alone should be telling.
florian wrote:I'd typically also appreciate that someone who offers strong opinions on subjects at least identifies himself in the public where he's doing that; I've always signed off stuff under my name. That may also be considered a matter of having balls or integrity, doesn't it?

Those remarks were never directed at you. They were directed at Scalix which has been hiding (= not saying anything) or lying (= promises on the phone about upcoming new releases).
florian wrote:You'll find my address and number in the Frankfurt phonebook.

You can find my address and number if you spend a couple of minutes on google (Hint: same nick in the ip phone forum). Or you could just PM me and ask

Just because my nickname is 'anybody' doesn't mean I particulary want to stay anonymous. This just is my nickname for historical reasons
