Page 1 of 2
Sync with PocketPC
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 10:32 pm
by pviglucci
Can someone tell me how to sync an Outlook Scalix profile with a PocketPC? I have read the previous posts and understand there are issues with ActiveSync. I am hoping that an enterprising user out there has figured out a workaround. Perhaps there is another sync software package that works? I've tried PocketMirror Pro for the PocketPC but is fails miserably. If not, could a support person possibly chime in and give an update as to an approximate time as to when the AcitveSync issues will be resolved? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.
Pete
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 9:58 am
by pviglucci
bump.
Anyone?
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 4:27 am
by florian
pviglucci,
what particular issues are you referring too? While we've seen various smaller problems, depending on the version of Active Sync, Outlook and Scalix Connect for Outlook being used, overall it works quite well and a good number of our customers are using this successfully.
We certainly recommend using Active Sync over other sync packages available for the Pocket PC.
Waiting for your input to further discuss,
Florian.
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 5:11 am
by jochen
Hi to all,
we are using version 4.1 of active sync and 9.4.2.6 connector. We have trouble with sent items, which are marked as not sent and lost date of sent time. We have ths problem even when we configure not to sync the emails (just calender, contacts, tasks)
regards, Jochen
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 5:44 am
by ScalixSupport
jochen wrote:Hi to all,
we are using version 4.1 of active sync and 9.4.2.6 connector. We have trouble with sent items, which are marked as not sent and lost date of sent time. We have ths problem even when we configure not to sync the emails (just calender, contacts, tasks)
regards, Jochen
Hello,
this is a known bug, the sent folder is indeed not synched. Please note that all our testing was done on Activesync 3.8. The version of AS although is irrelevant for this particular issue.
Cheers,
Sascha.
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 9:07 am
by pviglucci
Hi Florian,
Thanks for the reply. I am having the same issue mentioned in other posts on the forum. Here is the problem:
1) Create an appointment in Outlook.
2) Sync with the PocketPC using Activesync
3) Remove the PocketPC from the cradle and change the date or time of the appointment on the PocketPC
4) Place the PocketPC back on the cradle and sync with Outlook using ActiveSync
Result: The appointment momentarily changes in Outlook and then reverts to it's previous date/time leaving Outlook and the PocketPC is different states. You can watch the appointment jump back and forth on the Outlook calendar.
The behavior is not sporadic and happens every time.
If I create a new appointment on the PocketPC, it will sync properly with Outlook.
I am having no problems with Palm based devices.
Thanks,
Pete
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 10:02 am
by ScalixSupport
pviglucci wrote:Hi Florian,
Thanks for the reply. I am having the same issue mentioned in other posts on the forum. Here is the problem:
1) Create an appointment in Outlook.
2) Sync with the PocketPC using Activesync
3) Remove the PocketPC from the cradle and change the date or time of the appointment on the PocketPC
4) Place the PocketPC back on the cradle and sync with Outlook using ActiveSync
Result: The appointment momentarily changes in Outlook and then reverts to it's previous date/time leaving Outlook and the PocketPC is different states. You can watch the appointment jump back and forth on the Outlook calendar.
The behavior is not sporadic and happens every time.
If I create a new appointment on the PocketPC, it will sync properly with Outlook.
I am having no problems with Palm based devices.
Thanks,
Pete
Hello,
this is a known bug as well, sorry to not have better news. Development is working on a fix, but I cannot give you a firm release date yet.
Cheers,
Sascha.
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 12:01 pm
by pviglucci
Hello again,
Can you tell me if the problem with activesync mentioned in this thread has been addressed in version 10?
Thanks,
Pete
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 2:30 pm
by mcadmin
ScalixSupport wrote:jochen wrote:Hi to all,
we are using version 4.1 of active sync and 9.4.2.6 connector. We have trouble with sent items, which are marked as not sent and lost date of sent time. We have ths problem even when we configure not to sync the emails (just calender, contacts, tasks)
regards, Jochen
Hello,
this is a known bug, the sent folder is indeed not synched. Please note that all our testing was done on Activesync 3.8. The version of AS although is irrelevant for this particular issue.
Cheers,
Sascha.
So has this been addressed in anyway with version 10? If not what's the timeline with this specific issue?
Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 10:43 am
by zollikofer
Hi,
same problem here. Data (Calendar, Contacts) edited on PDA are not synced back to Scalix/IOutlook (ActiveSync 3.8, Outlook XP). IMHO this is not a "smaller problem", its a big one!
Is there a known working combination ActiveSync/Outlook/Scalix)?
Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 11:21 am
by pviglucci
Zollikofer,
Did you experience the problem with Scalix 10?
I am trying to find out if the problem has been fixed in the latest version.
Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 11:38 am
by zollikofer
pviglucci wrote:Zollikofer,
Did you experience the problem with Scalix 10?
I am trying to find out if the problem has been fixed in the latest version.
yes, scalix version 10 on redhat 4 (fresh install)
Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 11:41 am
by ScalixSupport
Hi,
unfortunately, the fix did not make it into the current release. I had been deferred in Dec. to the subsequent release of Figaro. As it is, no workaround is present. Sorry to not have better news.
Cheers,
Sascha.
Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 11:50 am
by zollikofer
tnx for reply.
Will this bug be fixed in future? I have to go in production with scalix in 2 weeks, but i can't, if this bug still exists :(
Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 11:52 am
by ScalixSupport
Hi,
yes, it will be fixed, but not in the next two weeks unless a miracle happens (which is entirely possible, yet unlikely).
Cheers,
Sascha.