Postby sutton.ryan » Wed Dec 28, 2005 2:08 pm
Mike,
I have a test Centos server running Fedora Directory Server on port 390 (MS recommends this port for alt ldap port for exchange)...FDS also is configured for 636 for all ldap auth for clients. I don't know what it takes to get scalix to use 636 with FDS, but since I have FDS on the same server, it simply uses port 390 on the localhost, therefore, the communication does not go over the wire, securing internal locahost communication is not necessary.
Regarding Samba, I have imported the samba ldif and configued samba for ldap lookup against FDS. FDS is very nice in that it will replicate (using 636) all samba stuff with ldap replication. Instead of using Microsoft domain membership, I use pGina to authenticate logins for Windows PCs. pGina uses port 636 and it can be configured to allow a user to be a local "user" or a "administrator". Using LDAP instead of samba (domain membership) allows all users (Linux, mac, windows) to exist as LDAP users in FDS. Only windows users get the samba schema added to their account by using smbpasswd -a (on the centos server). Only complaint I have so far is samba passwords have to be changed using usermin (hosted on Centos) and are seperate (not in sync) with the LDAP passwords. Also, samba can see all my posix users in LDAP, but it does not see the FDS groups....I have to create local groups on Centos and add FDS Ldap users to the groups. This requires keeping all uid and guids straight across servers. Regarldess, I have created single username/password environment to provide login, file server, print server, scalix email, ddns, ftp, http, without any Microsoft Server/Network products....(excluding XP clients).
Ryan