POP3 date not right

Discuss the Scalix Server software

Moderators: ScalixSupport, admin

d_newin

POP3 date not right

Postby d_newin » Fri Nov 03, 2006 12:13 pm

Hi.

I have a strange problem. Whenever I download a message through the Scalix POP interface, the message received date reflects the date the message actually hit the mailstore (server date), and NOT the date of my client machine.

I tried changing the date of my client machine back 2 hours, and the received message still shows the date the server received it. I thought the received date should change to the date of the local machine, since you could be anywhere in the world when you POP.

Any ideas?

richa

Postby richa » Sat Nov 04, 2006 9:04 pm

I have the same problem, but intermittantly; sometimes it will be the date/time on my machine, sometimes it will be the date/time when the message hit the server.

My client is MS Outlook 2003 v11.6359.6408 SP1.

I don't know the version of Scalix, but will find out.

Have you checked the email headers?
On mine the headers are always correct, which led me to think this was a client thing, but I haven't delved into it enough.

I'll be following this...

d_newin

Postby d_newin » Thu Nov 09, 2006 10:52 am

Well, I did some more testing, and:

1 - If I send mail from my google account (say it's sent at 10:00:00 AM) to the scalix server (received at 10:00:05 AM, per header), and I view the mail through SWA, the message correctly shows it was received at 10:00:05 AM. This is the server time. Then, if I POP the message onto my machine with Outlook, the received date of the message still shows the Server time (10:00:05 AM). This is incorrect

2 - If I send mail from another Scalix user (say it's sent at 11:00:00 AM) to a another local Scalix user (received at 11:00:01 AM), and I view the mail through SWA, the message correctly shows it was received at 11:00:01 AM (again, the server time). Now, if I POP the message onto my machine with Outlook, the received date of the messages changes to the time on my local machine. This is correct.

Any ideas anyone? Or is this expected behaviour.

dkelly
Scalix
Scalix
Posts: 593
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 2:03 pm

Postby dkelly » Thu Nov 09, 2006 1:20 pm

What version of the Scalix server are you running ?

Cheers

Dave

richa

Postby richa » Thu Nov 09, 2006 1:36 pm

ver: 10.0.1.3

dkelly
Scalix
Scalix
Posts: 593
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 2:03 pm

Postby dkelly » Thu Nov 09, 2006 3:16 pm

Can you post the MIME headers for each message ( Edit for security if necessary ) ?

Cheers

Dave

d_newin

Postby d_newin » Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:41 am

Hi.

I'm on 10.0.1.3


Header for test mail sent from Google (domain edited):

"
Return-Path: <x@googlemail.com>
Received: from scalix-uk.x.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by scalix-uk.x.co.uk (8.13.4/8.13.4/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id kA9EIo0j015812
for <darrell.newing@x.co.uk>; Thu, 9 Nov 2006 14:18:52 GMT
Received: from scalix-uk.x.co.uk (root@localhost)
by scalix-uk.x.co.uk (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id kA9EInGW015811
for <darrell.newing@x.co.uk>; Thu, 9 Nov 2006 14:18:49 GMT
Received: from srv-uk.x.co.uk (srv-uk-internal.x.co.uk 10.7.1.1)
by scalix-uk.x.co.uk (Scalix SMTP Relay 10.0.1.3)
via ESMTP; Thu, 09 Nov 2006 14:18:49 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com ([64.233.162.206])
by srv-uk.x.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <x@googlemail.com>)
id 1GiAjx-0007U6-Nq
for darrell.newing@x.co.uk; Thu, 09 Nov 2006 14:18:49 +0000
Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id s18so78280nze
for <darrell.newing@x.co.uk>; Thu, 09 Nov 2006 06:18:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.243.10 with SMTP id q10mr347467qbh.1163081925315;
Thu, 09 Nov 2006 06:18:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.65.183.9 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Nov 2006 06:18:45 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 14:18:45 +0000
From: "Darrell Newing" <x@googlemail.com>
To: "Darrell Newing" <darrell.newing@x.co.uk>
Message-ID: <8ac531dd0611090618j429ae6bby2d33c25c10184da6@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: test1420
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=googlemail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type;
b=SjRwVUyjwwi3z6EzbwZf8fKUQjbUI/BHkaNDzx/d+kFkEnvKrrHkz1R9Iwa4ggjeK0WI4t6CaRcYvIwd82iDOUIoXFKvSWPute+kHljoAZUe58x4NMAJZ2H2XyujQ/pstO+5yot1mdgYLjdMjUT4+BNJ1TKdF5Ew5Oj5Vf1upDM=
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,
HTML_SHORT_LENGTH,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no version=3.1.5
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.5 (2006-08-29) on
scalix-uk.x.co.uk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_36991_835008.1163081925268"
"




Header for mail sent from Scalix (domain edit):


"
Return-Path: <John.Doe@x.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 14:48:20 +0000
From: "John Doe" <John.Doe@x.co.uk>
To: "Darrell Newing" <darrell.newing@x.co.uk>
Message-ID: <"H000006a00009ccd.1163083699.scalix-uk.x.co.uk*"@MHS>
Subject: test1248
X-Scalix-Class: IPM.Note
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="2_4_5b_26b5fMHTML_=_01"

"

d_newin

Postby d_newin » Thu Nov 16, 2006 8:38 am

Any more suggestions on this?


Return to “Scalix Server”



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron