Hi dkelly,
e-mail: reveived by SCALIX:
Return-Path: <btirilee@tirile.com>
Received: from h8232.serverkompetenz.net (eproducts.de [81.169.187.38])
by h1047012.serverkompetenz.net (Scalix SMTP Relay 10.0.5.3)
via ESMTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:16:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: by h8232.serverkompetenz.net (Postfix)
id 904DC27408B; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:21:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: from b-cab730bb4dca4 (unknown [85.102.201.115])
by h8232.serverkompetenz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D068327408A
for <info@eproducts.de>; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:21:39 +0100 (CET)
Received: from 193.229.0.46 (HELO pop.kolumbus.fi)
by eproducts.de with esmtp (*-/'D)Q0,0 1PE5.)
id M*N3,--A38@N@-)*
for
info@eproducts.de; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:14:26 -0120
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:14:26 -0120
From: "Ronny Miner" <btirilee@tirile.com>
To: <info@eproducts.de>
Message-ID: <01c734c1$a254d6f0$6c822ecf@btirilee>
Subject: fwd:No fraud anymore!
Delivered-To:
confixx-du-290@h8232.serverkompetenz.net
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700
Thread-Index: Aca6QXS.75U,HO=6GTG1.*N?-FJ89G==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/related;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000A_01C734D2.65DDA6F0"
The same by OUTLOOK:
Return-Path: <btirilee@tirile.com>
X-Original-To:
info@eproducts.de
Delivered-To:
web0p1@h8232.serverkompetenz.net
Received: from b-cab730bb4dca4 (unknown [85.102.201.115])
by h8232.serverkompetenz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D068327408A
for <info@eproducts.de>; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:21:39 +0100 (CET)
Received: from 193.229.0.46 (HELO pop.kolumbus.fi)
by eproducts.de with esmtp (*-/'D)Q0,0 1PE5.)
id M*N3,--A38@N@-)*
for
info@eproducts.de; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:14:26 -0120
From: "Ronny Miner" <btirilee@tirile.com>
To: <info@eproducts.de>
Subject: fwd:No fraud anymore!
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:14:26 -0120
Message-ID: <01c734c1$a254d6f0$6c822ecf@btirilee>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/related;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000A_01C734D2.65DDA6F0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700
Thread-Index: Aca6QXS.75U,HO=6GTG1.*N?-FJ89G==
X-UIDL: ^`P"!E@c!!/~J!!0G4"!
X-Spam-Level: 9/5
X-FS-Classification-spam: 9
X-FS-Diagnostics: database-version=2006-12-21 tests=DIRECT_MX_FORGED_RECEIVED,FORGED_RCVD_HELO,FS_RATWARE_RCVD_ID,FS_RATWARE_THRIDX_GARB,HTML_60_70,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_12,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_SHORT_LINK_IMG_1,RCVD_IN_DSBL,RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RDNS_DYNAMIC_BIGINT,FS_CLASS_SPAM_9
X-Spam-Flag: Yes
You can see the difference. Why does the mail in OUTLOOK have the X-Spam-Level Flag and the mail in SCALIX not?